On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Jeff Kunkle <[email protected]> wrote:
> My particular use case meets both of those conditions. I’d like to use a > not operator to soft delete things for specific groups of users, which are > assigned a given authorization. For example, assume I have two groups of > users: group1 and group2. If I want to temporarily hide something from > group1 I would add “& !group1” to the visibility. In my case I’m not really > using the NOT operator for access control. The users in the group have > access to the data; they’ve just chosen to hide it from their view. > > > This scenario includes rewriting the data with the "& !group1" addition? Why not just rewrite the data to not include the group1 visibility at all?
