I'd love to see us move to slf4j. Hadoop is in the middle of a proposal about this too which sounds good to me.

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-common-dev/201404.mbox/%3CCA%2B4kjVv7N2dRR5rmdFHCpBx-K3yT7YRLs0Dvrvdjsn3iChUsEA%40mail.gmail.com%3E

On 4/23/14, 10:33 AM, Geoffry Roberts wrote:
If I were to pitch in on this,  how would it work?  and what logger?  Do
I submit patches?  Is slf4j the target?


On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    yes, there are also some bits using commons-logging. I think we
    managed to scrub out java.util.logging.


    On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Geoffry Roberts
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        I thought I'd check in.

        After some encouragement from this group, I found some time and
        now have an Accumulo client running in OSGi (Felix).  It's
        rather primitive, at this juncture, in that it is little more
        than a wrap job.  I was, however, forced to hack Zookeeper to
        get things to work.  Zookeeper needed to import an additional
        package.  I used the servicemix bundle for Hadoop.

        Josh, You asked if there was anything that could be done
        upstream to make osgification go better.  One thing, and it's
        not a huge deal, but getting everything on the same logging
        library would be nice.  So far, I see both log4j and slf4j.  Are
        there more?



        On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Russ Weeks
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Geoffry Roberts
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                You say the community would be well-accepting of
                bundling up the Accumulo client.  If that's the case,
                I'd like to hear from them.


            +1!




        --
        There are ways and there are ways,

        Geoffry Roberts




    --
    Sean




--
There are ways and there are ways,

Geoffry Roberts

Reply via email to