Sometimes it left unbalanced with new tserver hosts zero tablets or much less that others. So I had to restart master to initiate the balancing process. Then balancing was performed slowly without putting thousands of tablets offline.
On 1/11/15, John Vines <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a hunch that the 1.4 version being used possibly had one or more of > the many bugs regarding balancing getting 'stuck', which was typically > resolved via bouncing the master. Denis, in 1.4 when you brought you > tserver back online, did you find that things were then balanced or did you > just have a tserver up and things were left unbalanced? > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Denis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> yes, per server >> >> On 1/11/15, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Denis <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On 1/10/15, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> ... >> > >> >> 3) how many tablets do you have per server?.... >> > >> > 3. about 6000 >> >> >> > >> > >> > Just to confirm, this is 6000 tablets per-server and not 6000 tablets >> > per-table or overall, right? >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Sean >> > >> >
