They should all be using '0' which will cause the OS to allocate a dynamic port. I doubt your parallelism is so high on your tests that you exhaust the dynamic port range from the OS :)

Parise, Jonathan wrote:
Should I be doing something to dynamically allocate the ports? I am
using the MAC constructor that simply takes a File and a root password.

 From what I am seeing in the logs, it does look like ports could be the
cause. If all the MAC instances try to use the same ports, they would
conflict.

Jon

*From:*David Medinets [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Friday, June 26, 2015 2:36 PM
*To:* accumulo-user
*Subject:* Re: MiniAccumuloClutser Unit Test Problems

How are the ports dynamically allocated? If five MAC are started at the
same time, could they be stepping on each other?

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Josh Elser <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Makes sense. Thanks for clarifying!

Definitely send us a JIRA issue so we can track the issue and try to get
to the bottom of it.



Parise, Jonathan wrote:

Yes each test has a unique directory for the MAC.

I use the following code to ensure that:

storageDirectory_ = new File("atf-temp" + Path.SEPARATOR + "accumulo-test-"
+ UUID.randomUUID().toString());

Basically this makes a new random UUID so that I get very unique paths.
All of the directories end up in atf-temp. This way I can clean them up
easily.

Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Elser [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 10:50 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: MiniAccumuloClutser Unit Test Problems

Did each test class use a unique directory for MAC?

Assuming they're all unique, it sounds like a bug. I know some devs run
our suite of integration tests in parallel which use MAC out of the box.
If all of the above is true, please feel free to open up an issue on
JIRA and we can look into it more there.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa

Thanks!

Parise, Jonathan wrote:

Josh,

Sorry for the confusion. I'll try and explain again with better terminology.

I have several test classes, each of which contain several test methods.
For each test class I have an @BeforeClass that configures and starts a
MAC. I also have an @AfterClass that calls MAC.stop().

So the flow is MAC is created, 1-n tests in the class run against it,
MAC is stopped, repeat for next N tests.

This way several @test methods in the same class use the same MAC. I
mostly did this to make the tests run faster. I understand that having
several test methods share a MAC could cause test state pollution, but I
am careful to avoid that.

The issues I was seeing is that if I simply ran "mvn test", the first
few tests would pass and then eventually one of the tests would get
stuck forever and just keep throwing connection errors.

When I changed the maven configuration to force the tests to run
serially, the issue stopped occurring.

I'm not sure if there tests are expected to work when run in parallel.
My best guess is that the tests may conflict with each other over ports
or something like that.

I'd like to understand why changing the test running behavior fixed this
issue. Also, I think it would be good to document this somewhere. The
MAC javadoc and also the user's guide should provide details about using
the MAC for tests and properly configuring those tests.

Does that make more sense?

Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Elser [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 10:00 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: MiniAccumuloClutser Unit Test Problems

Jonathan,

If you're not seeing consistent behavior starting and stopping a
MiniAccumuloCluster repeatedly, that's a bug. If you can provide a code
which shows this problem, that'd be a huge help.

If you can get a list of the processes running when you see this happen
and cross-reference it with what processes should be running, that would
also go a long way in trying to debug this.

I am a little confused to your specific situation. You said that you
construct and start a MAC instance in a BeforeClass and stop it in an
AfterClass, but then you said that you start and stop it for each test.
Are you saying that after the third construction and use of a MAC, you
see problems? Or, are you saying that you stop and start each MAC
instance before you run the @Test methods?

- Josh

Parise, Jonathan wrote:

Hello,

I have been writing some J-unit tests based on the
MiniAccumuloCluster class. I'm experiencing some issues when several
of the tests run back to back. Before I get into the error, let me
explain how the tests work in general. Also, I am using Accumulo 1.6.2.

Each test has an @BeforeClass method that first creates a new random
directory. Then makes a new MiniAccumuloCluster instance using that
directory as the dir parameter. Then, I call MiniAccumuloCluster.start().

There are several @Test methods in each test class. The typical
pattern for them is that they create any necessary tables, write some
data into those tables and then scan to verify it was written
correctly. Basically they are testing that I can serialize and
deserialize various types of Objects correctly.

Then the test class as an @AfterClass method that calls
MiniAccumuloCluster.stop(). It also deletes the random directory used
by the previous test.

The issue I am running into is that generally the first test or two
run fine. However, the third test usually gets stuck in the
MiniAccumuloCluster startup. It just keeps complaining about being
unable to connect. Note that if the test is run independently it
passes just fine. When run back to back, I see errors like this one
repeatedly:

2015-06-26 09:10:24,352 INFO [main-SendThread(localhost:47046)]
zookeeper.ClientCnxn (ClientCnxn.java:startConnect(1058)) - Opening
socket connection to server localhost/127.0.0.1:47046
<http://127.0.0.1:47046>

2015-06-26 09:10:24,353 WARN [main-SendThread(localhost:47046)]
zookeeper.ClientCnxn (ClientCnxn.java:run(1185)) - Session
0x14e2ffc86d80004 for server null, unexpected error, closing socket
connection and attempting reconnect

java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused

at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)

at
sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:739
)

at
org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$SendThread.run(ClientCnxn.java:1143)

2015-06-26 09:10:24,956 INFO [main-SendThread(localhost:10406)]
zookeeper.ClientCnxn (ClientCnxn.java:startConnect(1058)) - Opening
socket connection to server localhost/127.0.0.1:10406
<http://127.0.0.1:10406>

2015-06-26 09:10:24,957 WARN [main-SendThread(localhost:10406)]
zookeeper.ClientCnxn (ClientCnxn.java:run(1185)) - Session
0x14e2ffcb2390004 for server null, unexpected error, closing socket
connection and attempting reconnect

2015-06-26 09:10:51,764 INFO [main-SendThread(localhost:10406)]
zookeeper.ClientCnxn (ClientCnxn.java:startConnect(1058)) - Opening
socket connection to server localhost/127.0.0.1:10406
<http://127.0.0.1:10406>

2015-06-26 09:10:51,765 WARN [main-SendThread(localhost:10406)]
zookeeper.ClientCnxn (ClientCnxn.java:run(1185)) - Session
0x14e2ffcb2390004 for server null, unexpected error, closing socket
connection and attempting reconnect

java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused

at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)

at
sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:739
)

at
org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$SendThread.run(ClientCnxn.java:1143)

2015-06-26 09:10:52,572 INFO [main-SendThread(localhost:47046)]
zookeeper.ClientCnxn (ClientCnxn.java:startConnect(1058)) - Opening
socket connection to server localhost/127.0.0.1:47046
<http://127.0.0.1:47046>

2015-06-26 09:10:52,573 WARN [main-SendThread(localhost:47046)]
zookeeper.ClientCnxn (ClientCnxn.java:run(1185)) - Session
0x14e2ffc86d80004 for server null, unexpected error, closing socket
connection and attempting reconnect

java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused

at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)

at
sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:739
)

at
org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$SendThread.run(ClientCnxn.java:1143)

2015-06-26 09:10:52,890 INFO [main-SendThread(localhost:10406)]
zookeeper.ClientCnxn (ClientCnxn.java:startConnect(1058)) - Opening
socket connection to server localhost/127.0.0.1:10406
<http://127.0.0.1:10406>

2015-06-26 09:10:52,891 WARN [main-SendThread(localhost:10406)]
zookeeper.ClientCnxn (ClientCnxn.java:run(1185)) - Session
0x14e2ffcb2390004 for server null, unexpected error, closing socket
connection and attempting reconnect

java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused

at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)

at
sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:739
)

at
org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$SendThread.run(ClientCnxn.java:1143)

2015-06-26 09:10:54,191 INFO [main-SendThread(localhost:10406)]
zookeeper.ClientCnxn (ClientCnxn.java:startConnect(1058)) - Opening
socket connection to server localhost/127.0.0.1:10406
<http://127.0.0.1:10406>

2015-06-26 09:10:54,192 WARN [main-SendThread(localhost:10406)]
zookeeper.ClientCnxn (ClientCnxn.java:run(1185)) - Session
0x14e2ffcb2390004 for server null, unexpected error, closing socket
connection and attempting reconnect

java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused

at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)

at
sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:739
)

at
org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$SendThread.run(ClientCnxn.java:1143)

2015-06-26 09:10:54,471 INFO [main-SendThread(localhost:47046)]
zookeeper.ClientCnxn (ClientCnxn.java:startConnect(1058)) - Opening
socket connection to server localhost/127.0.0.1:47046
<http://127.0.0.1:47046>

2015-06-26 09:10:54,471 WARN [main-SendThread(localhost:47046)]
zookeeper.ClientCnxn (ClientCnxn.java:run(1185)) - Session
0x14e2ffc86d80004 for server null, unexpected error, closing socket
connection and attempting reconnect

In the ZooKeeperServerMain.out I see lines like this repeating
several thousand times:

2015-06-26 08:39:44,810 INFO [SyncThread:0] server.NIOServerCnxn
(NIOServerCnxn.java:finishSessionInit(1580)) - Established session
0x14e2fe179eb0000 with negotiated timeout 30000 for client
/127.0.0.1:36311 <http://127.0.0.1:36311>

2015-06-26 08:39:45,278 INFO [ProcessThread:-1]
server.PrepRequestProcessor (PrepRequestProcessor.java:pRequest(419))
- Got user-level KeeperException when processing
sessionid:0x14e2fe179eb0000 type:create cxid:0x31
zxid:0xfffffffffffffffe txntype:unknown reqpath:n/a Error
Path:/accumulo/87e85c1f-eb40-4695-b11d-67ed88586648/tables/+r/conf
Error:KeeperErrorCode = NodeExists for
/accumulo/87e85c1f-eb40-4695-b11d-67ed88586648/tables/+r/conf

2015-06-26 08:39:45,300 INFO [ProcessThread:-1]
server.PrepRequestProcessor (PrepRequestProcessor.java:pRequest(419))
- Got user-level KeeperException when processing
sessionid:0x14e2fe179eb0000 type:create cxid:0x33
zxid:0xfffffffffffffffe txntype:unknown reqpath:n/a Error
Path:/accumulo/87e85c1f-eb40-4695-b11d-67ed88586648/tables/!0/conf
Error:KeeperErrorCode = NodeExists for
/accumulo/87e85c1f-eb40-4695-b11d-67ed88586648/tables/!0/conf

I've thought about putting a Thread.sleep() call after the
MiniAccumuloCluster.stop() call, but that certainly seems brittle.
I'm not sure if that would improve the situation.

It seems to me that the MiniAccumuloCluster does not behave well when
instances are started and stopped several times. I am running the
tests through Maven using the default test behavior.

Could it be something with Maven? Maybe I need to be more explicit
when telling it how to run the tests?

Anyone have any insight into what is going wrong here? In general is
my usage pattern correct for MiniAccumuloCluster?

Thanks,

Jon Parise

Senior Software Engineer

Viz | General Dynamics Missons Systems

*This message and/or attachments may include information subject to
GD Corporate Policies 07-103 and 07-105 and is intended to be
accessed only by authorized recipients. Use, storage and transmission
are governed by General Dynamics and its policies. Contractual
restrictions apply to third parties. Recipients should refer to the
policies or contract to determine proper handling. Unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not
an intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all
copies of the original message.*

Reply via email to