UNOFFICIAL
Does that mean I should have entries for 1vm in the metadata table corresponding to the root table? We are running 1.6.5 -----Original Message----- From: Josh Elser [mailto:josh.el...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2017 09:22 To: user@accumulo.apache.org Subject: Re: accumulo.root invalid table reference [SEC=UNOFFICIAL] The root table should only reference the tablets in the metadata table. It's a hierarchy: like metadata is for the user tables, root is for the metadata table. What version are ya running, Matt? Dickson, Matt MR wrote: > *UNOFFICIAL* > > I have a situation where all tablet servers are progressively being > declared dead. From the logs the tservers report errors like: > 2017-02-.... DEBUG: Scan failed thrift error > org.apache.thrift.trasport.TTransportException null > (!0;1vm\\125.323.233.23::2016103<,server.com.org:9997,2342423df12341d) > 1vm was a table id that was deleted several months ago so it appears > there is some invalid reference somewhere. > Scanning the metadata table "scan -b 1vm" returns no rows returned for 1vm. > A scan of the accumulo.root table returns approximately 15 rows that > start with; !0:1vm;<i/p addr>/::2016103 /blah/ // How are the root > table entries used and would it be safe to remove these entries since > they reference a deleted table? > Thanks in advance, > Matt > //
