Thanks all. I'll do that. Appreciate the quick responses.

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Keith Turner <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Srikanth Viswanathan
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thanks, Josh and Mike.
> >
> > This isn't causing any issues per se. We wanted to `chmod` the dir to be
> > publicly readable (for log aggregation), so there were questions around
> > where exactly to put the `chmod` call. I was then surprised to find that
> the
> > directory already existed. Do you recommend we rely on the directory
> already
> > existing after the distribution is untarred?
>
> Could use mkdir -p $logdir after untar.
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Srikanth
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Michael Wall <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Srikanth,
> >>
> >> Like Josh said, I don't think we make that guarantee.  But it is part of
> >> the maven assembly
> >> (https://github.com/apache/accumulo/blob/rel/1.8.1/
> assemble/src/main/assemblies/component.xml#L91)
> >> so I would expect the directory to continue to be there.  Is that
> causing
> >> you issues?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:46 PM Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Srikanth,
> >>>
> >>> I just checked 1.7.3 and 1.8.0, both of which have the logs/ directory
> >>> included in the bin-tarball. It isn't a change in packaging -- it's
> been
> >>> like this for some time.
> >>>
> >>> I don't expect that we would provide any guarantees about the presence
> >>> of this directory (but I don't know why we would chose to omit it,
> >>> either).
> >>>
> >>> - Josh
> >>>
> >>> On 6/26/17 4:27 PM, Srikanth Viswanathan wrote:
> >>> > Hi all,
> >>> >
> >>> > Kind of a silly question, but I noticed the `logs/` directory being
> >>> > packaged with the accumulo binary release. Do you mean to package
> this
> >>> > and do you guarantee this will be packaged in future releases?
> >>> >
> >>> > $ tar -tvf accumulo-1.8.1-bin.tar.gz |grep logs
> >>> > drwx------ mjwall/mjwall     0 2017-02-10 12:50 accumulo-1.8.1/logs/
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks,
> >>> > Srikanth
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to