Architectural interest in the feature/product is a very different thing
than interest in maintaining and testing said product ;)
I read Christopher's reply in a "there isn't interest in contributing
more to the service by the current, active developers" tone, in the
spirit of ASF's "do-oracy" approach. We would be very welcome for people
to come along and do more with it and separating it from the core
repository helps individuals see the fruits of their labor much more
quickly.
https://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html
On 8/29/19 11:57 AM, Roberts, Geoffry [USA] wrote:
I am surprised to learn that there apparently is scant interest in
proxy. I think it is attractive to support multiple languages. From my
view, the well-being of Accumulo depends on it. Maybe I am wrong.
*From: *Christopher <[email protected]>
*Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
*Date: *Thursday, August 29, 2019 at 11:31 AM
*To: *accumulo-user <[email protected]>
*Subject: *[External] Re: Accumulo 2.0 and the proxy Server
It was separated out so it could live or die on its own, as the case may
be. It hasn't received much development attention in awhile.
A new version hasn't yet been released from this new repo. If there is
still interest, somebody will need to devote some resources to attend to
it. One thing I'd like to see is for it to drop the multi user aspect,
and to support a single user via the new 2.0 client properties. It could
be simplified greatly that way, and possibly easier to maintain, if
there's still interest.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019, 10:25 Mike Miller <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Yes it has been pulled from the main Accumulo 2.0 repository. The
proxy is now in its own repo here:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo-proxy
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_accumulo-2Dproxy&d=DwMFaQ&c=f4NRRID3zFYDyClb0wZXwA&r=hc5v62HpZrcalgHOsVfthsgLhE5LrDVBm9xDs5ozH5U&m=7Up-S9F2rKbOkzCJgxhBsRFmB0ApKIbZU8v2xtMTBdo&s=aQSkYib3VNqayF7hd2x7X_MIqJhNV3u3LgrvCOacJ5w&e=>
It should still work the same.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:17 AM Roberts, Geoffry [USA]
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I hope this is a quick question.
I downloaded a copy of Accumulo 2.0 and noticed it does not
contain proxy.properties. Has it been removed? Will it work
with an older version of the file?
