dfs.namenode.http-address is supposed to be a user visible address. So FQDN is a better config.
Thanks, +Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/ On Dec 12, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Harp, Michael <[email protected]> wrote: > Using ambari 1.4.1.25, is there a way I can bind to 0.0.0.0 instead of the > FQDN? Seems that many of the services are already defaulting to 0.0.0.0 but > not dfs.namenode.http-address? > Thanks, > Mike -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
