> We could have an on-line manual for head of 1.6 and head of cvs. ? If I remember right, that was asked several time. Mmmh - but with prio to the javadoc ...
> > - seems to have the wrong tag (which could be the reason for > > the first point) > > No, it hasn't. The tag identifies the files that have been part of > Ant 1.6.2 - and this file hasn't been, so it shouldn't have the tag. Ok, for short: only use the "cvs tag" during a release. So the only possibility for now is the direct-checkout from cvs (maybe via web interface). Jan
