On Mon, 04 Apr 2005, David A. Bartmess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Are there any comments on the memory usage for using targets vs
> macrodefs in the build? 

The question usually is macrodef vs antcall and macros should consume
less memeory, not more.

In your situation I'd rather look for a memory leak in the things you
do.  Do you run any <java>, <javac> or <junit> tasks?  Sun's javac is
known to leak memory in certain JDKs, for example.

> The problem COULD lie in the wsdl generation, but we're not sure at
> this point.

How do you do that?

If you have any chance to fork the process into a separate Java VM, a
memory leak at least wouldn't affect your main build.

Cheers

        Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to