On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> True, a good place to turn it into add(ResourceCollection) later. > > Where do we stand on that? i.e. the above requires 3rd-party code to > recompile, or we can be nice
We have to be nice, I'd say. > Also, for tasks like this where the nested element should provide > files that have a basedir, does it make sense to provide support for > generic ResourceCollections, Probably not, you are right. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
