Eric Tchepannou wrote:
Hi Peter,
As my base class is an abstract class, I have no interest to use a <base />
My hope is to do the following:
---- Reflect.java --
package my;
public class Reflect extends org.apache.tools.ant.Task {
List types = new ArrayList();
public void add(BaseType bt) {
types.add(bt);
}
}
----BaseType.java------
package my;
public abstract BaseType implements IType {
...
}
----ConcreteType1|2.java------
package my;
public ConcreteType1|2 extends BaseType {
...
}
---- build.xml ---
<target name="reflect" depends="compile">
<taskdef name="reflect" classname="my.Reflect"
classpath="classes" loaderref="my.loaderref"/>
<typedef name="concete1|2" classname="my.ConcreteType1|2"
classpath="classes" loaderref="my.loaderref"/>
<reflect>
<concrete1/>
<concrete2/>
</reflect>
</target>
..
Does this make sense?
Yes, it is in fact the reason that the add(javaclass x) reflection
method was
added in ant 1.6.!
Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
