Hi, no one experienced any performance degradations?
I tested this stuff with plain distributions (from apache.org) and with ANT 1.6.5. The numbers stay the same. It does not matter if I use Java 1.4.2_08 or 1.5.0_03. Ullrich. > > most of the time I use ANT from within eclipse. > With eclipse 3.1M6 there is ANT 1.6.1 and eclipse 3.1RC2 > comes with ANT 1.6.4. > I am running this stuff on Windows XP Pro with SP2 on a P4 3 > GHz (1024MB RAM). > > There are some non-trivial scripts that I run every day. > One of them (referenced as script1) is fetching a lot of > files with the get task over https. > The other one (referenced as script2) is > deleting/copying/unzipping files from the eclipse workspace > to another location and is doing this with a lot of <ant> > calls since there are several sub-scripts in several subdirectories. > > For comparison I created small bat files to run ANT from commandline. > > For script1 I get the following numbers: > ANT 1.6.1 => 11 sec > ANT 1.6.4 => 32 sec > > For script2 I get the following numbers: > ANT 1.6.1 => 34 sec > ANT 1.6.4 => 1 min 16 sec > > Can some one explain this difference? > > The difference to be seen on the screen is that ANT 1.6.1 > prints line by line whereas 1.6.4 prints in chunks of 3 or 4 > lines (which makes the output a bit jumpy). > > Ullrich. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
