Dominique Devienne wrote:
I've used <cc> extensively with C/C++/Fortran, and although there's a learning curve to it, it's very good IMHO. Have you discussed your issues on the Ant-Contrib list? But I'll grant you, going the <cc> route is a significant investement. The dependency management is very good though, and allows to do reliable incremental builds. --DD
Yeah, the dependency stuff is the main reason I was interested in it. That and the ease of adding flags for specific operating systems while not affecting the others.
I did raise the issue over on the ant-contrib forums, but didn't get a response. The issue seems to be that even when you say name="g++", it still compiles with "gcc". I couldn't tell this for sure with the time I had, but I did make the observation that the output from <cc> was the same as when you forget to use g++ instead of gcc: you get missing libraries. I might just end up hacking the code since it seems like people have raised similar bugs of this nature on their bug tracker but which never get attention from the actual developers.
Daniel -- Daniel Noll Nuix Pty Ltd Suite 79, 89 Jones St, Ultimo NSW 2007, Australia Ph: +61 2 9280 0699 Web: http://www.nuix.com.au/ Fax: +61 2 9212 6902 This message is intended only for the named recipient. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message or attachment is strictly prohibited. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
