On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Patrick Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for this super-fast answer. > So <unzip> still has its importance.
Even if it didn't, we'd still keep it around for backwards compatibility and <unzip src="some.zip" dest="some-dir"/> may still be easier to read and more convenient to write than <copy toDir="some-dir"> <zipfileset src="some.zip"/> </copy> I'd stick with unzip unless I needed one of the additional features of copy (like mapping file names). > I am just being curious here... would it be hard to allow all file > based resource collection in <zipfileset> (several resources)? When I worked on the resource collection stuff I stopped short of turning zipgroupfileset into a resource collection as well. That would probably be what you have in mind. A collection that creates a zipfileset for each nested resource. I don't remeber why I didn't go that far, probably because zipgroupfileset was too strongly tied to the zip task to decouple it in a convenient way. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
