--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > this are not conditions, but filters. There's no > <not>. > > I guess a negate attribute on <linecontains[regexp]> > would be > required, or a <unchanged> weird pseudo filter that > accept a nested > filter, and 'reverses' the nested filter's job, by > accepting only > lines unchanged by the nested filter.
Hmm... I like that. Semantically superior to <not> wrt to filters and covers all of what could reasonably be expected of the hypothetical "not filter." Do you want to write it or should I? ;) -Matt > > Or some regexp wizardry of course. --DD > > On 7/11/06, Master, Tariq (Abbeywood) > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I'm sure I read an example in the ant manual using > the <not> element. > > (having inet access issues so no direct linke - > sorry) > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Aaron Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 11 July 2006 16:20 > > To: Ant Users > > Subject: Line *Doesn't* Contain? > > > > How can I do a negative filter in a filterchain? > I've tried to use a > > negative lookahead regexp /.*(?!foo).*/, but so > far no luck. > > -- > > Aaron Davies > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
