This is indeed as designed, and it is pretty usefull because you can set the property p in t1 or t2. This pattern is quiet often used.
Gilles Scokart 2009/8/31 Francis GALIEGUE <f...@one2team.com> > Hello everyone, > > I have noticed something strange in the if="" and unless="" attributes > of targets. > > Let's say that I have: > > <target name="t1"/> > > <target name="t2" unless="p2"/> > > <target name="t" unless="p" depends="t1, t2"/> > > If I: > > ant -Dp2=1 > > then, as expected, t1 triggers via t but not t2. > > However, if I: > > ant -Dp=1 > > I'd have expected none of t1 and t2 to execute, but both are executed! > > Which means that the dependencies of a target are executed before even > any if="" or unless="" attributes are taken into account... This is > rather counterintuitive to my eyes. Is this really the expected > behaviour or is this a bug? > > > -- > > Francis Galiegue > ONE2TEAM > Ingénieur système > Mob : +33 (0) 683 877 875 > Tel : +33 (0) 178 945 552 > f...@one2team.com > 40 avenue Raymond Poincaré > 75116 Paris > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@ant.apache.org > >
