I use the <if> from ant-contrib combined with antcall or antcallback to have
more flexibility on calling targets.
I use properties like ${nocvs} to not use CVS, even when the target is executed
(again using <if> or unless)
I have unless properties for CVS, junit, javadoc, compile .....
In your case:
<target name="checkout-sources" depends="other stuff" unless="nocvs">
<!-- takes several minutes -->
In "other stuff" you have to introduce other unless properties probably.
Now you run
ant -Drelease.number=... -Dnocvs=true target1"
whil you run target2 this way
ant -Drelease.number=... target2"
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Niklas Matthies [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. August 2010 00:35
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Conditional target problem
We have something like the following (target bodies omitted):
<target name="checkout-sources" depends="other stuff">
<!-- takes several minutes -->
<target name="determine-release-number"
depends="checkout-sources" unless="release.number">
<!-- determines release.number from sources -->
<target name="target1" depends="determine-release-number">
<!-- needs release.number -->
<target name="target2" depends="checkout-sources, target1">
<!-- needs sources and target1 -->
The problem: "ant -Drelease.number=... target1" causes
checkout-sources (and its dependencies) to be executed although there
is no need for it, as release.number is already defined.
We can't put the unless="release.number" on checkout-sources (and its
dependencies) because it would break target2 when release.number is
predefined.
We can't make checkout-sources a macro (called both by target2 and by
determine-release-number) because of all its dependencies, and also
because an up-to-date check on it is highly non-trivial, so in the
target2 case it might end up being executed twice.
We _could_ duplicate the body and the dependencies of checkout-sources
into determine-release-number (and remove the latter's dependency on
checkout-sources), but I'd have to do that for quite a number of the
dependencies as well, as they contribute to the expensiveness of
checkout-sources. The result would be a lot of redundancy, effectively
duplicating a dependency subgraph.
Is there a way to solve the problem, within a single Ant instance,
without creating redundancies?
-- Niklas Matthies
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
