Hi Greg, Thanks for your email. Please see my replies inline.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Gregg Kellogg <[email protected]>wrote: > Do you ever expect to fully support RDFa 1.1? > Yeah we do. Eventually someone will get around to it. If this is an itch you have, we would very much encourage you to itch it and push it back into the Any23 codebase ;) > Look like it's just RDFa 1.0 with prefix support, even that fails many > tests. > Based on which version of Any23? Have you tried this new release or are you just stating this based on your previous experience/assumptions? Please refer to thhe following ticket for a new RDFa parser proposal which can be considered as the flagship issue of the 1.0 release. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ANY23-137 I think in the past, we've suggested using alternative Java RDFa > implementations; both Semargl [1] and clj-rdfa [2] are quite performant > (substantially faster than the any23 endpoint [3]) and fully conforms to > the spec. > The end point you refer to has recently been overhauled and will be updated with nightly SNAPSHOT's of stable Any23 code from now on. I've just jumped on to leading this initiative so please bare with us until our scripts pull the next build some time tonight. > > Running the basic test suite[4] shows you passing only 58 out of 170 tests. > Again, based on what version of Any23? We are currently at 1.0. I would however really like to work with whoever runs this service to improve the stats as much as possible... once I know what the stats are actually quantifying and representing. Thanks Lewis
