As others have indicated, that's clearly outside of the specs.
However, I see two different improvements we could add to Aries
Blueprint to support such use cases:
<ext:call ref="server" method="addConnector">
<argument>
<bean .../>
</argument>
</ext:call>
or (maybe closer to the underlying jetty model):
<bean id="server" class="org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server"
init-method="start" destroy-method="stop">
<ext:list-property method="addConnector">
<list>
<bean .../>
</list>
</ext:list-property>
</bean>
I haven't given that a lot of thoughts, and I'm not really sure how/if
this can actually be implemented ...
Both could actually be useful I suppose.
2011/2/22 Łukasz Dywicki <l...@code-house.org>:
> Hello,
> I have small problem with Aries. I try to configure jetty with blueprint.
> Jetty requires to register some objects using void methods, for example:
> Server.addConnector(Connector).
>
> I try to use blueprint XML:
>
> <bean id="server" class="org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server"
> init-method="start" destroy-method="stop"
> />
>
> <bean id="http" factory-ref="server" factory-method="addConnector"
> depends-on="jersey">
> <argument>
> <bean
> class="org.eclipse.jetty.server.nio.SelectChannelConnector">
> <property name="port" value="8080" />
> <property name="host" value="0.0.0.0" />
> </bean>
> </argument>
> </bean>
>
> This configuration causes following error:
> org.apache.aries.blueprint - 0.2.0.incubating | Unable to start blueprint
> container for bundle jetty-server
> org.osgi.service.blueprint.container.ComponentDefinitionException: Unable to
> instantiate components
> at
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl.instantiateEager
> Components(BlueprintContainerImpl.java:628)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.2
> .0.incubating]
> at
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl.doRun(BlueprintC
> ontainerImpl.java:315)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.2.0.incubating]
> at
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl.run(BlueprintCon
> tainerImpl.java:213)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.2.0.incubating]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441)[:1.6
> .0_21]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)[:1.6.0_21
> ]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)[:1.6.0_21]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$
> 301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)[:1.6.0_21]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(Sch
> eduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:207)[:1.6.0_21]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.ja
> va:886)[:1.6.0_21]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:9
> 08)[:1.6.0_21]
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)[:1.6.0_21]
> Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.put(ConcurrentHashMap.java:881)[:1.6.
> 0_21]
> at
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintRepository.addPartialObject(Bl
> ueprintRepository.java:357)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.2.0.incubating]
> at
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.di.AbstractRecipe.addPartialObject(AbstractRecipe
> .java:84)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.2.0.incubating]
> at
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BeanRecipe.internalCreate(BeanRecipe.ja
> va:736)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.2.0.incubating]
> at
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.di.AbstractRecipe.create(AbstractRecipe.java:64)[
> 7:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.2.0.incubating]
> at
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintRepository.createInstances(Blu
> eprintRepository.java:219)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.2.0.incubating]
> at
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintRepository.createAll(Blueprint
> Repository.java:147)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.2.0.incubating]
> at
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl.instantiateEager
> Components(BlueprintContainerImpl.java:624)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.2
> .0.incubating]
> ... 10 more
>
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
