Hello,
Is injection using java 5 generics allowed?
My scenario - I am creating two generic classes:
public class MyClass1<V extends MyBaseClass> implements Runnable {
public MyClass1(long myArgument) {
}
}
-----
public class MyClass2<E extends MyBaseClass> implements MyInterface<E> {
// just using default constructor
}
which I want to insert into another class:
public class MyClass3 {
public MyClass3(MyClass1<MyImplementationClass> myClass1,
MyInterface<MyImplementationClass> myInterface) {
}
}
In my blueprint file I have:
<bean id="myClass1" class="com.mycompany.MyClass1"
init-method="start" destroy-method="stop">
<argument value="5000" />
</bean>
<bean id="myClass2" class="com.mycompany.MyClass2" />
<bean id="myClass3" class="com.mycompany.MyClass3" >
<argument ref="myClass1"/>
<argument ref="myClass2"/>
</bean>
If I run this as is, blueprint will throw the following exception:
org.osgi.service.blueprint.container.ComponentDefinitionException:
Unable to find a matching constructor on class com.myCompany.myClass3
for arguments [com.mycompany.MyClass1@787f7957,
com.mycompany.MyClass2@66525531] when instanciating bean myClass3
at
org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BeanRecipe.getInstance(BeanRecipe.java:272)[31:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.3.1]
at
org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BeanRecipe.internalCreate(BeanRecipe.java:706)[31:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.3.1]
at
org.apache.aries.blueprint.di.AbstractRecipe.create(AbstractRecipe.java:64)[31:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.3.1]
at
org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintRepository.createInstances(BlueprintRepository.java:219)[31:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.3.1]
at
org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintRepository.createAll(BlueprintRepository.java:147)[31:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.3.1]
at
org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl.instantiateEagerComponents(BlueprintContainerImpl.java:640)[31:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.3.1]
at
org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl.doRun(BlueprintContainerImpl.java:331)[31:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.3.1]
at
org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl.run(BlueprintContainerImpl.java:227)[31:org.apache.aries.blueprint:0.3.1]
at
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441)[:1.6.0_26]
at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)[:1.6.0_26]
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)[:1.6.0_26]
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)[:1.6.0_26]
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:206)[:1.6.0_26]
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)[:1.6.0_26]
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)[:1.6.0_26]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)[:1.6.0_26]
If I remove the generic specification from the MyClass3 constructor,
everything works OK:
public class MyClass3 {
public MyClass3(MyClass1 myClass1, MyInterface myInterface) {
}
}
Is that what is supposed to happen? Am I not allowed to use generics
in constructor arguments?
thanks in advance,
Gareth