For starters, LogBack is a Logging implementation, right ? Pax Logging is a capture-all logging service for all major interfaces and does provide a minimalistic implementation. But you want to use Pax Logging + Logback in an OSGi scenario. Thats at least what i know of Logback. Most of that knowledge i pull from times where log4j was hot. So i might be wrong if log back might actually replace pax logging in some ways. That i don't know.
@Matt, you are sure cross posting this on felix, aries and ops4j ? cheers, Toni On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Matt Madhavan <[email protected]>wrote: > Hello, > I would like to know the Pros and cons of PaxLogging vs Logback. I have > used PaxLogging a lot but the my client's Enterprise team (different team) > that sets directions, would like to use Logback. > > Can someone let me know what are the pros and cons between the two and > especially in the OSGi world? > > Thanks in advance! > > Matt > -- Toni Menzel Source <http://tonimenzel.com>
