SimpleBean is a very simple bean;-):
public class SimpleBean {
public SimpleBean() { }
}
And it makes no difference if there is a constructor or not.
Daniel
________________________________________
Von: Daniel Kulp [[email protected]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2013 18:57
An: [email protected]; Zweifel, Daniel
Betreff: Re: Problem with ref argument in Aries 1.0
Does SimpleBean have a public no-arg constructor? If not, can you add one?
Dan
On Jan 16, 2013, at 3:55 AM, "Zweifel, Daniel" <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is a copy of my post to the Fuse ESB forum
> (http://fusesource.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=4554&tstart=0), because
> it's an Aries problem.
>
>
> Hi all
>
> I have discovered a problem with ref arguments in Fuse 7.1.0 (Aries 1.0).
>
> With Fuse 7.0.0 (Aries 0.3) this was working:
>
> <bean id="factoryBean" class="ch.suisa.common.BeanFactory"/>
> <bean id="simpleBean" class="ch.suisa.common.SimpleBean">
> <tx:transaction method="*" value="Required" />
> </bean>
> <bean id="extBean" factory-ref="factoryBean" factory-method="createBean">
> <argument ref="simpleBean"/>
> </bean>
>
> Now I get an exception when starting the bundle:
> org.osgi.service.blueprint.container.ComponentDefinitionException: Unable to
> find a matching factory method createBean on class
> ch.suisa.common.BeanFactory for arguments
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BeanRecipe$UnwrapperedBeanHolder@10867a57
> when instanciating bean extBean
>
> The problem seems to be the tx:transaction decoration on simpleBean. When I
> leave this away, I can start the bundle.
>
> Is this a bug or intended behaviour?
>
>
> Daniel
--
Daniel Kulp
[email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
