Hi Guillaume,
that are really great news. Thanks a lot for it.
I planned to try it next weekend. Btw, could you tell me if there are
any snapshot maven repository containing those jars ?
best regards,
Cristiano
On 15-04-2014 08:32, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Actually, I don't really think discovering service capabilities and
services specifically for blueprint is a good idea.
The OSGi r5 now defines a service namespace so bundles should add
those generic capabilities in their manifest and subsystems should
only use those informations.
This would be more generic and allow other technologies such as SCR or
even bundles using plain OSGi API to leverage service dependencies at
resolution.
2014-04-15 13:08 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
The refactoring is done.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1587513
Subsystem is now completely independent of applications and
blueprint (though it will still be leveraged if present).
2014-04-14 21:35 GMT+02:00 Holly Cummins
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
If applications aren't using blueprint this analysis of
blueprint files won't be providing any useful information, so
we should be able to make something in that chain optional
without loss of function. Of course, doing that refactoring
may not meet anyone's definition of 'easy'. :)
On Monday, April 14, 2014, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Actually, the Aries Application Modeller really needs
Aries Blueprint as it analyses blueprint files to find
provided services, so this dependency can't be easily
removed.
Guillaume Nodet
2014-04-14 17:19 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet
<[email protected]>:
Yes, it would be nice to have subsystems being
independent of blueprint imho.
2014-04-14 16:37 GMT+02:00 Cristiano Gavião
<[email protected]>:
Hi Mark.
Well, last time I tried, the subsystems service
(zero) wasn't registered without blueprint bundles
in active state.
Seems that a dependency of subsystem,
application-modeller, has a direct dependency to
blueprint:
https://github.com/apache/aries/tree/trunk/application/application-modeller/src/main/resources/OSGI-INF/blueprint
regards,
Cristiano
On 11-04-2014 11:45, Mark Nuttall wrote:
Hello,
I've looked over the code and can only see a
dependency on blueprint in the subsystem-itests
pom. So there's a dependency on blueprint to run
the itests, but I cannot see a runtime dependency
from subsystem-core on blueprint, Have I missed
something?
Regards,
Mark
On 10 April 2014 14:13, Cristiano Gavião
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I had a system that was developed using only
Declarative Services. We are studying to use
Subsystem to help with an isolation issue.
The first problem for us is that it depends
on Blueprint and we don't like the idea to
add this overhead in this environment just to
be able to use Subsystems.
Could someone explain me this dependency? are
beans being injected or just services?
would be possible to use DS instead of
Blueprint in case no bean being injected ?
thanks
Cristiano
