As I said couple of days ago, the repo has been created. I have to push latest 
changes before donation. I will do the donation next week.
RegardsJB 


Sent from my Samsung device

-------- Original message --------
From: Morgan Hautman <[email protected]> 
Date: 22/04/2016  20:39  (GMT+00:00) 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: Karaf-boot 

Hi Brad,

JB is donating Karaf-boot to Apache Karaf, I know the repo is made so 
it's a matter of days/weeks when it will be under Apache Karaf :)

But a schedule has yet to be defined about the first release and what we 
want in it ect..

Regards,
Morgan

On 2016-04-22 17:17, Brad Johnson wrote:
> When is karaf-boot due out? Roughly.  2016? August? September?  2017?
>
> I'm pretty stoked about it because I think it is really going to open 
> a lot of vistas.  I haven't had a lot of time to fiddle with my 
> Raspberry Pi but when i think about a self-deploying, thin karaf with 
> all dependencies and all the OSGi capabilities and libraries that's 
> pretty astounding.
>
> The testing seems like it would be straight forward for things like 
> black box web testing.  In that sample code I posted the other day you 
> could see a couple of simple fluent clients I use for create SOAP and 
> REST clients for testing.
>
> It would appear that without using Pax Exam or 
> CamelBlueprintTestSupport I'll be able to boot a karaf container and 
> run tests against it if I expose any web services.  I'll commonly 
> create delegate/adapters that can switch based on configuration 
> between using an internal set of Test stubs and actual implementations 
> and sometimes even remote implementations.  The test stubs I use 
> always provide models that reflect what the bundle would be receiving 
> from any endpoint calls it makes so it permits me to exercise the 
> validators, transformers, business logic and web services without 
> having any integration in place.
>
> Being able to use plain ol' Junit (Poju?) and send and receive web 
> service calls that exercise self-container karaf/OSGi bundle sets is 
> pretty damned exciting.
>
> Brad

Reply via email to