I just subscribed the dev mailing list and replied with a vote, don't see it yet though.
Tom Op di 14 mrt. 2017 om 11:11 schreef David Bosschaert < [email protected]>: > Hi, > > The voting started but nobody except for me voted +1 so the release > process didn't finish. It would help if you could leave a vote on the > voting email at [email protected] as well... > > Cheers, > > David > > On 14 March 2017 at 09:17, Tom De Wolf <[email protected]> wrote: > > David, > > We have seen that you did the release of the esa-maven-plugin 1.0.2. > However it is not yet available on > https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.aries/esa-maven-plugin, any > idea when it can be expected there? > > Thanks, > > Tom > > Op ma 6 mrt. 2017 om 17:42 schreef Tom De Wolf <[email protected]>: > > David, > > We tested our use cases and the current trunk version is working > perfectly. Thanks for releasing it this week and letting us know when it is > in maven central. > > Best regards, > > Tom > > Op ma 6 mrt. 2017 om 15:16 schreef David Bosschaert < > [email protected]>: > > Hi Tom, > > I'd be happy to cut a release sometime this week - could you please double > check that the current trunk version of the plugin works for you? > > Cheers, > > David > > On 6 March 2017 at 14:06, Tom De Wolf <[email protected]> wrote: > > David, > > Thanks for getting both pull requests merged into the esa-maven-plugin > trunk. What are the next steps to get a release of it available on the > central maven repository? When could we expect it so we can integrate it in > our application builds? > > Thx > > Tom > > Op do 2 mrt. 2017 om 16:47 schreef David Bosschaert < > [email protected]>: > > Hi Tom, > > I can take a look at it sometime soon. > > Cheers, > > David > > On 2 March 2017 at 15:26, Tom De Wolf <[email protected]> wrote: > > All, > > Who is maintainer of the esa-maven-plugin within the aries code base? We > have a few pull requests we would like to get accepted and delivered in a > new release: > > https://github.com/apache/aries/pull/69 for > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1490 > > and > https://github.com/apache/aries/pull/63/ for > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1650 > > As they both touch the same code it would be best to first merge pull > request 69, then we can adapt pull request 63 and get that reviewed and > merged. > > Any help would be much appreciated. > > Best regards, > > Tom De Wolf > > > > >
