GitHub user AlenkaF added a comment to the discussion: A new home for pyarrow-stubs?
Thank you for opening up this discussion! There is a general consensus on the need for type annotations in PyArrow. In my opinion, the main challenge to progress is the lack of agreement on the approach to take. To add some context, here are a few key comments from the ongoing discussion in https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/32609: - The latest summary from @jorisvandenbossche: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/32609#issuecomment-2334113297 - Insights from @paleolimbot regarding the nanoarrow experience: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/32609#issuecomment-2112805759 - Advice from the pyarrow-stubs author: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/32609#issuecomment-2335025542 GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/arrow/discussions/45919#discussioncomment-12611707 ---- This is an automatically sent email for user@arrow.apache.org. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: user-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org
