GitHub user willtemperley added a comment to the discussion: Why does the Parquet encoding list show both 'PLAIN' and 'BIT_PACKED'? Is BIT_PACKED actually used?
What version of parquet-mr would you consider to be legacy? I'm looking at a parquet file which was written by parquet-mr 1.13.1. The def levels are stated as being BIT_PACKED when they're empty. It's an interesting question because when designing a parquet reader, it would be nice to not to have to support deprecated BIT_PACKED. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/arrow/discussions/47113#discussioncomment-14315111 ---- This is an automatically sent email for [email protected]. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected]
