Hi David, Sorry, I have to bothering you again. But, do you have any opinions on this comment https://tinyurl.com/3mpfpa85 from ejona86, one of the team member from grpc-java If what he said is true then do you welcome for a PR to update the way we get the ByteBuffer (stop using reflection to get the ByteBuffer,...).
Regards, Son Nguyen > On 18 Dec 2025, at 08:21, Sơn Nguyễn <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi David > Thank you for your answer > >> On 18 Dec 2025, at 00:22, David Li <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> OkHttp is not tested. But feel free to try. >> >> In principle Flight is "just" a gRPC Protobuf definition. In practice I'm >> not sure that's true, unfortunately. >> >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025, at 18:47, Sơn Nguyễn wrote: >>> Hello guys. >>> >>> I need to use Okhttp as an underline transport for grpc, but as I >>> checkout the Flight source code, I have a feeling that you guy only >>> want make Flight works with Netty not Okhttp or any other transports. >>> I want to ask that any reason that I should not use Okhttp for Flight? >>> >>> Thank you in advance >
