+1 to this. Since no one else has chimed in with any concerns, I'll move head with reverting the name aurora-executor and attempt to share as much code as possible between the debian based of packages.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Erb, Stephan <[email protected]> wrote: > I am ok with this as well, as long as the packages have a consistent names > across all distributions. > > > > *From: *Jake Farrell <[email protected]> > *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, " > [email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Date: *Thursday, 5 January 2017 at 19:14 > *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: Proposed Debian package name change > > > > +1 to making them consistent across both package types, but I'm a fan of > keeping the aurora prefix in the package names and not using thermos as the > package. I had a change at one point to move the RPM over to using > aurora-executor > so they would be the same, will have to do dig that branch up > > > > -Jake > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Erb, Stephan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > +1 for renaming and dropping of the old init scripts. > > > > We can also add a `replace` directive to smoothen the transition (e.g > https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/ > specs/debian/control#L53). > > > > *From: *Renan DelValle <[email protected]> > *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Date: *Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 23:30 > *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Proposed Debian package name change > > > > Hello Aurorans, > > > > I'm currently in the process of contributing packaging for Ubuntu Xenial. > As many of you know, Xenial was shipped with a change of init system to > systemd. > > Originally I had intended to use the systemd unit files from the Debian > Jessie packaging. The Debian Jessie unit files, in this case, are simply > calling the init scripts. > > While this works well on Debian Jessie, it unfortunately causes some > issues on Ubuntu Xenial as Xenial will try to convert the init script > before using the systemd unit file. > > Thus, I set out to rewrite the systemd unit files in a more systemd > idiomatic way using the RPM unit files as reference. > > > > In the course of doing this, I noticed that the RPM package for thermos is > named thermos.rpm while the DEB counterpart is named aurora-executor.deb > > TL;DR: Is anyone opposed to renaming aurora-executor.deb to thermos.deb in > future releases to maintain consistency across packaging? > > > > -Renan > > > > > > >
