On 03/21/2011 10:46 AM, Aleksey Maslov wrote:
> If I would like to place common data into a parent avro object, and some
> additional detailed data into 2 logically separate children data objects –
> could I specify such relationship of the objects in avro IDL, or I can keep
> the relationship implied only?

If I understand what you're asking, this might be modeled in Avro as a
record for the parent that contains the common data, plus a "child"
field whose type is a union of the two child objects.  Would that work?

Doug

Reply via email to