Hello,

we fixed the issue and are ready to test :) - is there a RC already
available?

Best,
Tobi

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:59 PM Kaymak, Tobias <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> happy to help testing! I am currently fixing a networking issue between
> our dev cluster for integration tests and the Kafka it is consuming from.
> After that I would be ready to spin it up and test
>
> Best,
> Tobi
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:13 PM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for reporting / filing / collecting the issues.
>>
>> There is a fix pending: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10950
>>
>> As for the upgrade issues, the 1.8 and 1.9 upgrade is trivial. I will
>> check out the Flink 1.10 PR tomorrow.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Max
>>
>> On 24.02.20 09:26, Ismaël Mejía wrote:
>> > We are cutting the release branch for 2.20.0 next wednesday, so not
>> sure
>> > if these tickets will make it, but hopefully.
>> >
>> > For ref,
>> > BEAM-9295 Add Flink 1.10 build target and Make FlinkRunner compatible
>> > with Flink 1.10
>> > BEAM-9299 Upgrade Flink Runner to 1.8.3 and 1.9.2
>> >
>> > In any case if you have cycles to help test any of the related tickets
>> > PRs that would help too.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:47 AM Kaymak, Tobias <
>> [email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Hi Kyle,
>> >
>> >     thank you for creating the JIRA ticket, I think my best option right
>> >     now is to wait for a Beam version that is running on Flink 1.10 then
>> >     - unless there is a new Beam release around the corner :)
>> >
>> >     Best,
>> >     Tobi
>> >
>> >     On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:52 PM Kyle Weaver <[email protected]
>> >     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >
>> >         Hi Tobi,
>> >
>> >         This seems like a bug with Beam 2.19. I filed
>> >         https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9345 to track the
>> issue.
>> >
>> >          > What puzzles me is that the session cluster should be allowed
>> >         to have multiple environments in detached mode - or am I wrong?
>> >
>> >         It looks like that check is removed in Flink 1.10:
>> >         https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15201
>> >
>> >         Thanks for reporting.
>> >         Kyle
>> >
>> >         On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 4:10 AM Kaymak, Tobias
>> >         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >             Hello,
>> >
>> >             I am trying to upgrade from a Flink session cluster 1.8 to
>> >             1.9 and from Beam 2.16.0 to 2.19.0.
>> >             Everything went quite smoothly, the local runner and the
>> >             local Flink runner work flawlessly.
>> >
>> >             However when I:
>> >                1. Generate a Beam jar for the FlinkRunner via maven (mvn
>> >             package -PFlinkRunner)
>> >                2. Glue that into a Flink 1.9 docker image
>> >                3. Start the image as a Standalone Session Cluster
>> >
>> >             When I try to launch the first pipeline I get the following
>> >             exception
>> >
>> >             org.apache.flink.client.program.ProgramInvocationException:
>> >             The main method caused an error: Failed to construct
>> >             instance from factory method
>> >             FlinkRunner#fromOptions(interface
>> >             org.apache.beam.sdk.options.PipelineOptions)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  
>> org.apache.flink.client.program.PackagedProgram.callMainMethod(PackagedProgram.java:593)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  
>> org.apache.flink.client.program.PackagedProgram.invokeInteractiveModeForExecution(PackagedProgram.java:438)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  org.apache.flink.client.program.ClusterClient.run(ClusterClient.java:274)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  org.apache.flink.client.cli.CliFrontend.executeProgram(CliFrontend.java:746)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  org.apache.flink.client.cli.CliFrontend.runProgram(CliFrontend.java:273)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  org.apache.flink.client.cli.CliFrontend.run(CliFrontend.java:205)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  
>> org.apache.flink.client.cli.CliFrontend.parseParameters(CliFrontend.java:1010)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  
>> org.apache.flink.client.cli.CliFrontend.lambda$main$10(CliFrontend.java:1083)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  
>> org.apache.flink.runtime.security.NoOpSecurityContext.runSecured(NoOpSecurityContext.java:30)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  org.apache.flink.client.cli.CliFrontend.main(CliFrontend.java:1083)
>> >             Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Failed to construct
>> >             instance from factory method
>> >             FlinkRunner#fromOptions(interface
>> >             org.apache.beam.sdk.options.PipelineOptions)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  
>> org.apache.beam.sdk.util.InstanceBuilder.buildFromMethod(InstanceBuilder.java:224)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  org.apache.beam.sdk.util.InstanceBuilder.build(InstanceBuilder.java:155)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  org.apache.beam.sdk.PipelineRunner.fromOptions(PipelineRunner.java:55)
>> >                      at
>> org.apache.beam.sdk.Pipeline.run(Pipeline.java:309)
>> >                      at
>> org.apache.beam.sdk.Pipeline.run(Pipeline.java:301)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  ch.ricardo.di.beam.KafkaToBigQuery.main(KafkaToBigQuery.java:180)
>> >                      at
>> >             sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> >                      at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  
>> org.apache.flink.client.program.PackagedProgram.callMainMethod(PackagedProgram.java:576)
>> >                      ... 9 more
>> >             Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>> >                      at
>> >             sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> >                      at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  
>> org.apache.beam.sdk.util.InstanceBuilder.buildFromMethod(InstanceBuilder.java:214)
>> >                      ... 19 more
>> >             Caused by:
>> >             org.apache.flink.api.common.InvalidProgramException:
>> >             Multiple environments cannot be created in detached mode
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  
>> org.apache.flink.client.program.ContextEnvironmentFactory.createExecutionEnvironment(ContextEnvironmentFactory.java:67)
>> >                      at java.util.Optional.map(Optional.java:215)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  
>> org.apache.flink.api.java.ExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment(ExecutionEnvironment.java:1068)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  
>> org.apache.beam.runners.flink.translation.utils.Workarounds.restoreOriginalStdOutAndStdErrIfApplicable(Workarounds.java:43)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  org.apache.beam.runners.flink.FlinkRunner.<init>(FlinkRunner.java:96)
>> >                      at
>> >
>>  org.apache.beam.runners.flink.FlinkRunner.fromOptions(FlinkRunner.java:90)
>> >                      ... 24 more
>> >
>> >             I've checked the release notes and the issues and couldn't
>> >             find anything that relates to this. What puzzles me is that
>> >             the session cluster should be allowed to have multiple
>> >             environments in detached mode - or am I wrong?
>> >
>> >             Best,
>> >             Tobi
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >     --
>> >
>> >     Tobias Kaymak
>> >     Data Engineer
>> >     Data Intelligence
>> >
>> >     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >     www.ricardo.ch <http://www.ricardo.ch/>
>> >     Theilerstrasse 1a, 6300 Zug
>> >
>
>

Reply via email to