Hey Gláucia, we do use the "good first issue" label. In my experience I've
seen mixed results with it - sometimes it is a good starting point, other
times folks self-assign the issues and then never make progress on them. It
is also challenging to enforce a consistent quality of "good first issue"
(some may end up being too hard, and the easier ones are the first to go
anyways). Overall, I think it probably helps, but definitely doesn't fully
solve the problem. Anecdotally, I think people tend to get better traction
when they come to the repo with a specific problem to solve that they've
encountered using Beam, though obviously that's a much more narrow funnel.

Thanks,
Danny

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 8:43 AM Gláucia Esppenchutz <glauesp...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Dear Apache Beam community,
>
> My name is Gláucia and I work in the Diversity initiative in Apache Org.
> We are setting up a project to engage more volunteers in Apache, and bring
> more diversity and inclusion to our community.
>
> This project aims to incentivize other Apache projects to adopt the "Good
> First Issues" tag in their less complex issues, making people more
> comfortable and welcome to contribute.
>
> However, before starting it, we wanted to hear your experience using this
> tag in GitHub. Do people use this as a first step to start contributing to
> the project?
> Do you think it breaks a barrier and makes people feel less intimidated to
> contribute?
>
> This feedback will be very important to us to understand how to conduct
> the project and encourage minorities who are frequently afraid to take the
> first step in an open-source project contribution.
>
> Many thanks in advance.
>
> Gláucia
>

Reply via email to