Thanks for the heads up. This is a good reminder of the need to go through and recheck correctness of all code snippets in the guide. I've created a new JIRA issue to track this ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1013)
I'm working on some IO content right now, so I'll get this snippet corrected as part of that. On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Frances Perry <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the report! > > +Melissa for FYI, as she's working on revamping the programming guide > right now (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-193) > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 7:53 PM, darion.yaphet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Jean :<br/><br/>thanks for you reply :) <br/><br/>I'm confirming all >> the API is OK and after that I will create a JIRA-issue to describe it . >> At 2016-11-13 13:53:38, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >Hi Darion, >> > >> >you can name can be provided directly to the apply: >> > >> >.apply("read", TextIO.Read...) >> > >> >It's the "regular" and generic approach. >> > >> >You are right the documentation should be fixed there. >> > >> >Maybe we can provide a PR to fix that (or at least create a Jira) ? >> > >> >Thanks ! >> > >> >Regards >> >JB >> > >> >On 11/13/2016 04:30 AM, darion.yaphet wrote: >> >> Hi team : >> >> I'm a beginner in learning and using Apache Beam . When I reading >> Apache >> >> Beam Programming Guide >> >> (http://beam.incubator.apache.org/documentation/programming- >> guide/#pcollection) to >> >> startup my first beam application I found the document miss match for >> >> current Java API TextIO.Read.named seems have removed ? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >-- >> >Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> >[email protected] >> >http://blog.nanthrax.net >> >Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > >
