I went with Request Tracker. It has a different set of problems --
every ticket system does -- but it seems more manageable and definitely
has active support.
https://www.bestpractical.com/rt/
In fairness to the BH team, this is a symptom of a systemic problem with
Apache projects that aren't considered "hip."
* James http://james.apache.org/. Email server with no active
development since 2012. It died right in the middle of beta-testing
it's next major release.
* SpamAssassin http://spamassassin.apache.org/. No active development
between 2011 and 2014, but might be picking up again.
* Geronimo http://geronimo.apache.org/. Java EE 6 application server
with no development since 2013. However, in Apache's defense, it could
be said that Oracle killed Java.
Joseph D. Wagner
On 09/10/2015 10:50 PM, Hoiniji Rosonye wrote:
I think going to Trac is a good decision. With all due respect to the
BH team, I think it still has a long way to go. I first gave BH a
try, but it had too many bugs or configuration limits. I then decided
to try Trac, and I found that it was very rock solid.
On Sep 10, 2015 9:42 PM, "Torben Lauritzen" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi.
Thank you for your replies - I will go with the standard Trac for
the moment then. But I will be following Bloodhound.
/Torben
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olemis Lang [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>]
> Sent: 11. september 2015 05:57
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Is it alive?
>
> JFTR , I am working on a private fork of Bloodhound that I use
for my
> deployments . Nonetheless I've had to slow down my dev speed
because I'm
> contributing with code to the Brython project , and I've not had
all the time
> I'd like these days for BH dev .
>
>
> On 9/10/15, Ryan J Ollos <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Torben Lauritzen
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> I was just about to install Trac, when I found Bloodhound. I have
> >> tried installing it, and it seems ok. But at the same time it
also
> >> looks like the project is more or less dead - last release was
> >> 2014-12-11, the documentation has unfinished things, e.g. the
> >> section about git here:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/wiki/BloodhoundInstall
(the page
> >> was last edited 7 months ago), there is a warning
> >> (SubversionException) at the top of the Wiki pages etc.
> >>
> >> So, I just wanted to know if the project is still alive? Are
anybody
> >> working actively on the project?
> >>
> >
> > Yeah there hasn't been much activity lately. I don't have any
> > immediate plans or time to work on Bloodhound in the near
future, but
> > I'd be interested to hear if any other developers will be
working on it.
> >
> > - Ryan
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Olemis - @olemislc
>
> Apache™ Bloodhound contributor
> http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound
> http://blood-hound.net
>
> Brython committer
> http://brython.info
> http://github.com/brython-dev/brython
>
> Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
> Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/
>
> Featured article:
