Ah, it would be 4.3.2. sorry. - Sijie
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Enrico Olivelli - Diennea < enrico.olive...@diennea.com> wrote: > Actually I’m running 4.3.1 version in production are you sure that the new > version would not be 4.3.2 ? > > > > This is my pom.xml > > > > <dependency> > > <groupId>org.apache.bookkeeper</groupId> > > <artifactId>bookkeeper-server</artifactId> > > <version>4.3.1</version> > > <scope>compile</scope> > > <exclusions> > > <exclusion> > > <groupId>org.slf4j</groupId> > > <artifactId>slf4j-log4j12</artifactId> > > </exclusion> > > <exclusion> > > <groupId>netty</groupId> > > <artifactId>io.netty</artifactId> > > </exclusion> > > <exclusion> > > <groupId>commons-logging</groupId> > > <artifactId>commons-logging</artifactId> > > </exclusion> > > <exclusion> > > <groupId>commons-digester</groupId> > > <artifactId>commons-digester</artifactId> > > </exclusion> > > <exclusion> > > <groupId>commons-beanutils-core</groupId> > > <artifactId>commons-beanutils</artifactId> > > </exclusion> > > <exclusion> > > <groupId>commons-cli</groupId> > > <artifactId>commons-cli</artifactId> > > </exclusion> > > <exclusion> > > <groupId>jna</groupId> > > <artifactId>net.java.dev.jna</artifactId> > > </exclusion> > > </exclusions> > > </dependency> > > > > *Da:* Enrico Olivelli - Diennea [mailto:enrico.olive...@diennea.com] > *Inviato:* giovedì 10 settembre 2015 09:00 > *A:* Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>; user@bookkeeper.apache.org > *Oggetto:* R: Apache Bookkeeper 4.0 release date > > > > I’m running 4.3.1, a fix on 4.3 would be great, thanks ! > > > > *Da:* Sijie Guo [mailto:si...@apache.org <si...@apache.org>] > *Inviato:* mercoledì 9 settembre 2015 20:03 > *A:* user@bookkeeper.apache.org; Enrico Olivelli - Diennea < > enrico.olive...@diennea.com> > *Oggetto:* Re: Apache Bookkeeper 4.0 release date > > > > I think a bug fix release is much safer for you rather than cutting 4.4.0, > since there is much more newer features in 4.4.0. > > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hello Enrico: > > We could port this change to 4.3 branch and cut a bug fix release 4.3.1. > Are u running 4.3.x or 4.2.x branch? > > - Sijie > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Enrico Olivelli - Diennea < > enrico.olive...@diennea.com> wrote: > > (sorry for cross-posting) > > > > Due to that bug in our production servers Bookies directories are > continuing to grow, and the only “fix” is to destroy the bookie after some > time and setup up a new bookie. > > I hope noone else run into this trouble. > > > > We will be longing for the release > > Thank you a lot > > > > Enrico Olivelli > > > > > > *Da:* Flavio Junqueira [mailto:fpjunque...@yahoo.com] > *Inviato:* mercoledì 9 settembre 2015 12:47 > *A:* user@bookkeeper.apache.org > *Cc:* d...@bookkeeper.apache.org > *Oggetto:* Re: Apache Bookkeeper 4.0 release date > > > > Hi Enrico, > > > > That's a good question. There are no blockers and only 3 patch available, > shall we cut an RC for 4.4.0 soon? What do folks think? > > > > -Flavio > > > > On 08 Sep 2015, at 13:40, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > we got into https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-695. I see > that is as been fixed in 4.4.0 release. > > Is there any estimated release date for 4.4.0 ? > > Thank you very much > > Bookkeeper is great > > Enrico Olivelli > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter per rimanere aggiornato su digital ed > email marketing! http://www.magnews.it/newsletter/ > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter per rimanere aggiornato su digital ed > email marketing! http://www.magnews.it/newsletter/ > > ------------------------------ > Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter per rimanere aggiornato su digital ed > email marketing! http://www.magnews.it/newsletter/ >
