On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 4:09 AM Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > I am experimenting DBLedgerStorage with some project. > With my workloads I don't see much benefit, or sometimes a performance > degradation, > Do you have a performance comparison? Or can you describe what have you observed? > just by keeping the same bookie and application configuration (just > switching the storage manager classe name in the bookie configuration). > > Which is the expected workload for DBLedgerStorage ? > (Usually I am using the default SortedLedgerStorage) > Ideally it should be working out better when you have large number of ledgers per bookie (let's say more than 10k ledgers). > > Cheers > Enrico > > > >
