Hi, I don't know 'what' guarantee tck compilance but i did a build some minutes ago using java 8.
And on eclipse i use a quickfix to automatic implement unimplemented methods just to not get compilation problems. But it is my question too, that means "Tck OK" ? mvn clean install -Ptck11 [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Reactor Summary: [INFO] [INFO] Apache BVal :: bval-parent (Parent POM) ........... SUCCESS [3.071s] [INFO] Apache BVal :: bval-core .......................... SUCCESS [3.208s] [INFO] Apache BVal :: bval-xstream (optional) ............ SUCCESS [2.496s] [INFO] Apache BVal :: bval-jsr ........................... SUCCESS [9.005s] [INFO] Apache BVal :: bval-json (optional) ............... SUCCESS [2.399s] [INFO] Apache BVal :: bval-extras (optional) ............. SUCCESS [2.035s] [INFO] Apache BVal :: bval-tck11 (TCK Runner) ............ SUCCESS [38.128s] [INFO] Apache BVal :: org.apache.bval.bundle ............. SUCCESS [0.704s] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Total time: 1:01.535s [INFO] Finished at: Wed Apr 16 18:35:50 BRT 2014 [INFO] Final Memory: 95M/420M [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------- http://eprogramming.github.io On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Michael Blyakher < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I haven't heard back on this question. Is there someone out there that can > shed any information on the 1.1 branch tck compliance? > > Thanks, > Mike > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Michael Blyakher < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> A while back it was reported that the bval implementation in the 1.1 >> branch was tck compliant ( >> http://bval.apache.org/board-reports/2013-09.html). Does the tck that >> was run against this implementation test CDI integration as well? >> >> Thanks, >> Mike >> > >
<<inline: 01.png>>
