Hi Francesco, I'm on my phone, but if I'm reading the linked code correctly, you have no constraints declared on the abstract implementation class, so as far as I recall off the top of my head you are correct that there should be no opportunity for an exception of this type. I will be happy to take a look at this in the near future (we already have other tweaks to release as v2.0.1); feel free to create a JIRA issue and/or suggest a patch if you dig into the code before one of us does.
Matt On Fri, Nov 2, 2018, 11:21 AM Francesco Chicchiriccò <[email protected] wrote: > Hi all, > I am trying to upgrade BVal to 2.0.0 in Syncope. > > I have changed my POMs as follows: > > * javax.validation:validation-api from 1.1.0.Final to 2.0.1.Final > * org.apache.bval:bval-jsr from 1.1.2 to 2.0.0 > > When I try to reach up some of the REST services (based on CXF 3.2), an > exception as [1] is thrown; I have read about such exception, but it seems > to me that the mentioned methods in interface [2] and implementation [3] > should comply with hierarchy rules. > > Nevertheless, if I swap > > org.apache.bval:bval-jsr:2.0.0 > > with > > org.hibernate.validator:hibernate-validator:6.0.13.Final > > all is working fine. > > Any idea? > > TIA > Regards. > > [1] https://paste.apache.org/hxvY > [2] > https://github.com/apache/syncope/blob/2_1_X/common/rest-api/src/main/java/org/apache/syncope/common/rest/api/service/AnyService.java#L70 > [3] > https://github.com/apache/syncope/blob/2_1_X/core/rest-cxf/src/main/java/org/apache/syncope/core/rest/cxf/service/AbstractAnyService.java#L68 >
