We looking into migrating from a replicated solr infrastructure to some form of clustered approach. Lucandra looks fantastic -- but this statement is troubling:
"No normalizations are stored (no scoring)" from http://github.com/tjake/Lucandra When I use the demo/samples get do get a relevance score, can anyone describe (or give a scenario) when this limitation would become a problem? Thanks in advance. On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 05:16 +0000, Jake Luciani wrote: > Lucandra spreads the data randomly by index + field combination so you > do get "some" distribution for free. Otherwise you can use "nodetool > loadbalance" to alter the token ring to alleviate hotspots. > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:04 AM, HubertChang <hui...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If you worked with Lucandra in a dedicated searching-purposed > cluster, you > could balanced the data very well with some effort. > > >>I think Lucandra is really a great idea, but since it needs > order-preserving-partitioner, does that mean >>there may be > some 'hot-spot' > during searching? > > -- > View this message in context: > > http://n2.nabble.com/Lucandra-or-some-way-to-query-tp4900727p4905149.html > Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org mailing list > archive at Nabble.com. > >
