no, it's not atomic. it just shortens the roundtrip of many update requests. Some may fail and some may succeed
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Per Olesen <p...@trifork.com> wrote: > Can I expect batch_mutate to work in what I would think of as an atomic > operation? > > That either all the mutations in the batch_mutate call are executed or none > of them are? Or can some of them fail while some of them succeeds? > >
