> I think this is actually the expected result, whenever you are using
> range_slices with start_key/end_key you must increment the last key
> you received and then use that in the next slice start_key. I also
> tried to use token because of exactly that behaviour and the doc
> talking about inclusive/exclusive.

Another way to do it is to filter results to exclude columns received
twice due to being on iteration end points.

This is useful because it is not always possible to increment or
decrement (depending on iteration order) a column name (for example,
in the case of byte strings, because there is no defined maximum
possible length so the lexicographically "previous" column name might
be infinitely long).

-- 
/ Peter Schuller

Reply via email to