> [OT] They're quoting roughly the same price for both (claiming > that the > extra cost goes into having for each node a separate disk > cabinet to run > local raid-5). > > You might not need raid-5 for local attached storage.
Yes we did ask. But raid-5 is the minimum being offered from our hosting provider... We could go to raid 10, but raid 0 is out of the question... ~mck -- "To be young, really young, takes a very long time." Picasso | http://semb.wever.org | http://sesat.no | http://finn.no | Java XSS Filter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
