With the Order Preserving Partitioner you are responsible for balancing the rows around the cluster, http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/Operations?highlight=%28partitioner%29#Token_selection
Was there a reason for using the ordered partitioner rather than the random one? What does the output from nodetool ring look like ? You can change the token for the small node so that it takes ownership of more of the data see http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/Operations#Moving_nodes You will need to understand the row keys you are using and pick the token appropriately. Hope that helps. Aaron On 17 Mar 2011, at 22:50, Ali Ahsan wrote: > Hi All > > We are running Cassandra 0.6.3,We have two node's with replication factor one > and ordered partitioning.Problem we are facing at the moment all data is > being send to one Cassandra node and its filling up quite rapidly and we are > short of disk space.Unfortunately we have hardware constrain and we cannot > add more hard disks.my current ring situation is that one node contain 89 GB > and other have only 500 MB we are not able to sort this out why this is > happening.Please give suggestion how can we solve this issue asap. > > -- > S.Ali Ahsan > > Senior System Engineer > > e-Business (Pvt) Ltd > > 49-C Jail Road, Lahore, P.O. Box 676 > Lahore 54000, Pakistan > > Tel: +92 (0)42 3758 7140 Ext. 128 > > Mobile: +92 (0)345 831 8769 > > Fax: +92 (0)42 3758 0027 > > Email: ali.ah...@panasiangroup.com > > > > www.ebusiness-pg.com > > www.panasiangroup.com > > Confidentiality: This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential > and/or privileged. If you are not a named recipient, please notify the > sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person > use it for any purpose or store or copy the information in any medium. > Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, secure, error > or virus-free. We do not accept liability for any errors or omissions. >
