80% sure that is an obsolete comment. Eric, can you verify?
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:22 AM, David Boxenhorn <da...@taotown.com> wrote: > Is this still true? > > Note: The greater-than and less-than operators (> and <) result in key > ranges that are inclusive of the terms. There is no supported notion of > “strictly” greater-than or less-than; these operators are merely supported > as aliases to >= and <=. > > I think that making > and < aliases of >= and <= is a terrible idea! > > First of all, it is very misleading. Second, what will happen to old code > when > and < are really supported? (Some day they will be supported!) > -- Jonathan Ellis Project Chair, Apache Cassandra co-founder of DataStax, the source for professional Cassandra support http://www.datastax.com
