> > That being said, we do not provide isolation, which means in particular > that > reads *can* return a state where only parts of a batch update seems applied > (and it would clearly be cool to have isolation and I'm not even > saying this will > never happen).
Out of curiosity, do you see any architectural issues that makes this one hard to do (given the limitations already in place for atomicity) or is it more a case of "its just that nobody has put it high enough on their priority list to do it yet?" Terje
