https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3488
On Nov 12, 2011, at 9:52 AM, Jeremy Hanna wrote: > It sounds like that's just a message in compactionstats that's a no-op. This > is reporting for about an hour that it's building a secondary index on a > specific column family. Not sure if that's the same thing. I see in the > data directory definitely new files written with the old index names we had 3 > months ago. For example: > 23760494 Nov 12 15:45 account_snapshot.idx_time_bucket-g-91-Data.db > > On Nov 12, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Nate McCall wrote: > >> Sounds like it could be >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3123 ? (which was >> fixed in 0.8.5). >> >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Jeremy Hanna >> <jeremy.hanna1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> We're using 0.8.4 in our cluster and two nodes needed rebuilding. When >>> building and streaming data to the nodes, there were multiple instances of >>> building secondary indexes. We haven't had secondary indexes in that >>> keyspace since like mid-August. Is that a bug? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jeremy >
