On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Leonid Ilyevsky <lilyev...@mooncapital.com>wrote:
> At this point I am really confused about what direction Cassandra is > going. CQL 3 has the benefit of composite keys, but no dynamic columns. > I thought, the whole point of Cassandra was to provide dynamic tables. > See my earlier post on the subject: http://www.mail-archive.com/user@cassandra.apache.org/msg23160.html You can have a dynamic table with CQL3, you just can't have a table with a mix of dynamic/nondynamic columns. -- Derek Williams
