Well no one says my assertion is false, so it is probably true. Going further, what would be the steps to migrate from STC to LCS ? Is there any precautions to take doing it using C*1.1.6 (like removing commit logs since drain is broken) ?
Any insight or link on this procedure would be appreciated. 2013/2/25 Janne Jalkanen <janne.jalka...@ecyrd.com> > > At least for our use case (reading slices from varyingly sized rows from > 10-100k composite columns with counters and hundreds of writes/second) LCS > has a nice ~75% lower read latency than Size Tiered. And compactions don't > stop the world anymore. Repairs do easily trigger a few hundred > compactions though, but it's not that bad. > > /Janne > > On Feb 25, 2013, at 17:10 , Alain RODRIGUEZ <arodr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi > > > > I am just wondering... Wouldn't it always be worth it to use LCS on > counter CF since LCS is optimized for reads and that writing a counter > always require a read ? > > > > Alain > >
