The issue is, I can get the original TTL using the select and use it for the update, however since TTL can not be dynamic (using ?) it will exhaust the prepared statement cache, because I have tons of updates like this and every one will have a different signature due to changing TTL. I am using 1.2.3 now.
Thanks On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Alain RODRIGUEZ <[email protected]>wrote: > This seems to be the correct behavior. An update refreshes the TTL, as it > does in memcache for example. Yet, what I do not know is whether this > behavior can be changed somehow to let the initial TTL, this might be > useful on some use cases. > > Alain > > > 2013/4/26 Shahryar Sedghi <[email protected]> > >> Apparently when I update a column using CQL that already has a TTL, it >> resets the TTL to null, so if there was already a TTL for all columns that >> I inserted part of a composite column set, this specific column that I >> updated will not expire while the others are are getting expired. Is it how >> it is expected to work or it is a bug? >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> Shahryar >> >> >> > -- "Life is what happens while you are making other plans." ~ John Lennon
